[KynaoParticipant]

Hello Peter,

Did you consider this ?

[KynaoParticipant]

Thanks you Dimitar, you’re of great help. I will try that

[KynaoParticipant]

Hi Peter,

There is no need to do text rotations. see screen shot at the end of this page “”
Screenshots of “Storehr” example, verticallly you will see “Profile, organization, documents, employees, incident…”

Regards

[KynaoParticipant]

Thanks you pmelande, that will help all of us to progress on the subject.

[KynaoParticipant]

And a jqxTree supporting virtualization could be an option too ?
I mean for a bookmarking app, a tree-grid is a little too much for the goal.

On my side, i plan to use 2 trees integrated into sliding panels to offer navigation usability and discretion.
While tree-grid is a great component i will have use for but it has a quite different use than jqxTree, the ergonomy, purpose and targeted users are also different.

[KynaoParticipant]

I can send you a screencast demo of a search done in a xmark treeview, it’s particularly efficient and so useful saving so much time, i only saw them doing that, a perfect example to follow or to suggest here at least.

[KynaoParticipant]

Thanks for thinking and discussing of it. So there may be ajax loading for a Tree-Grid and a jqxTree ? You mentionned jqxTree in your last message but maybe you meant Tree-Grid. What is the technical meaning of “Tree supports Virtualization” ?

[KynaoParticipant]

Even me, i rarely open more than 20 folders during a session (and also rarely more then 10 at a time), even if we say 50 folders, that’s manageable. It is aboiut a working session, not a game consisting of clicking on the maximum folders as possible.

Last but not least it’s also the responsability of the user who learn how to behave depending of the impact but once again i saw several treeviews working fine with huge number of entries. What is the optimised way, if any to feed a jqwidget tree ? json, source, ul (or they are all the same at the end) ?

[KynaoParticipant]

I already saw other treeviews with thousands of items working fine this way.

When we have an important proportion of folders, that indicates there is a will of organization, anyway there is no sense to put one thousand of items into one folder, that is not usable and if the user “want” to increase the size of the DOM, he would have to open all his folders, i don’t see a user doing this…

Furthermore, as a demonstration, i have an example of this extreme situation : xmarks online service, it loads my 29000 bookmarks, it works fine, even the search which is incredibly fast by opening folders to point out the element in the hierarchy. xmarks does not use ajax loading, that’s the reason why i said it is the extreme situation, so the result is the time needed to open first time. With ajax loading we would not dive either into an important time loading neither into increasing the dom like xmark does (no user will open his 15000 folders manually…)

[KynaoParticipant]

Yes, i’m aware of it and took it into consideration when tested and reported it.
I use Firefox 12 under windows xp 32

[KynaoParticipant]

With ajax loading, there are not thousands of items anymore, that’s the point.

[KynaoParticipant]

This is cool, thanks.
I think there is a bug in the demo (or the script itself) :

Try to drag&drop “Education” between “Support” and “support home”; “Education” goes below “Customer service”.
But sometimes it works as expected which is strange by itself. In this case try to drag&drop “Education” below “Products” and then again between “Support” and “support home”, you should see the bug playing around these manipulations.

[KynaoParticipant]

I’m interested into this too.
Your documention with PHP integration is excellent and this would be interesting to add this case to the doc.

[KynaoParticipant]

The reason i asked for this is i currently try to build a bookmark management application (something like sitebar script as a basis if you know it). Many users have a lot of bookmarks or they would not need such an app. In extreme situations there are users like me having around 28600 bookmarks and 15000 folders.

That’s quite impossible to load so much data or at least would clearly not be reasonable and pleasant to use…
I would like to allow the users to share their treeview and exchange information from one tree to another, which make the problem even worse.

So right now, i’m in trouble to progress on this subject. Do you think something possible to do in this area and plan it in the roadmap ?
If yes, and as your php demos are extremely useful, i would love to see a php sample.

[KynaoParticipant]

That’s great. Can we have more than one instance of tree in a single page and drag&drop from one tree to another ?

[Author]

Posts